From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Wed Nov 29 04:11:01 1995
Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id EAA22320 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 04:10:58 -0500
Message-Id: <199511290910.EAA22320@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id E3C26039 ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 4:01:57 -0500
Date:         Wed, 29 Nov 1995 04:00:41 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Fuzzy Fallacies
To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: OR

>It would be interesting to know what exactly is supposed to go in a
>place for a standard. Are any of these right:
>
>        ko'a condi fo mi
>        Koha is deep/tall by standard me.
>
>        ko'a condi fo leka ke'a zmadu lo mitre be li papimu
>        Koha is deep/tall by standard being more than a length of 1.5m
>
>        ko'a condi fo lo'e remna
>        Koha is deep/tall by standard the average human.
>

All.  In the first you are comparing with yourself, in the second with 1.5M
and in the 3rd with the average human.  The open question is whether
a anc require a tu'a, because elaborating requires the same kind of leka
phrase as the 2nd.

lojbab