From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Thu Nov 30 17:19:20 1995
Received: from wnt.dc.lsoft.com (wnt.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.7]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id RAA12617 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 17:19:15 -0500
Message-Id: <199511302219.RAA12617@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by wnt.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.0a) with SMTP id 9AA89210 ; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 16:55:08 -0500
Date:         Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:53:11 -0700
Reply-To: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE X2: non-logical bridi-tail
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.bitnet
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR

>It is now probably too late because it would take too much work to verify
>that any given LR(non-1) grammar generated the same Lojban grammar, or even
>anything close.

Probably true as a practical matter, but eventually knock wood there'll be
academic interest in the language and we'll want to be able to define it in
a more theoretically understandable way.  So it ought to be at least a
long-term goal.
                     ____
 Chris Bogart        \  /  http://www.quetzal.com
 Boulder, CO          \/   cbogart@quetzal.com