Message-Id: <m0tHkV7-0000ZWC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Date:         Tue, 21 Nov 1995 05:04:58 MET
Reply-To:     Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
Subject:      Re: all the chinese whispers
To:         Lojban Listserv <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
Content-Length: 733
Lines: 18

> > > {zilxru}: I meant {zil} to delete x1 of {xruti} - i.e. go from
> > > "x1 returns x2 to x3 from x4" to "z1=x2 returns to z2=x3 from z3=x4".
> > xorxes was right: zilxru *was* an abomnination.
>
> Well what are {zio} and {zil-} for, if not for cases exactly like
> these?

zi'o is exactly for cases like this. zil- is OK when it can be found in
the dict. I just couldn't figure it out. :) Anyway, xruti is changed,
and it's good.

co'o mi'e. goran.

--
GAT/CS/O d?@ H s:-@ !g p1(2)@ !au(0?) a- w+(+++) (!)v-@(+) C++(++++)
UU/H(+) P++>++++ L(>+) !3 E>++ N+ K(+) W--(---) M-- !V(--) -po+ Y(+)
t+@(+++) !5 !j R+@ G-@(J++) tv+(++) b++@ D++ B? e+* u@ h!$ f?(+) r--
!n(+@) y+. GeekCode v2.1, modifications left to reader to puzzle out