Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tLVLB-0000ZUC; Fri, 1 Dec 95 15:17 EET
Message-Id: <m0tLVLB-0000ZUC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 33856AAA ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 14:17:25 +0100
Date:         Thu, 30 Nov 1995 15:13:25 -0700
Reply-To:     Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Subject:      Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.bitnet
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 204
Lines: 6

John cusku:
>However, the gismu "fasnu" is true only of such event abstract objects
>as actually occur.

How does that fit in with the notion that unmarked bridi may be either
"ca'a" or "ka'e" or "nu'o"?