Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tFYxg-0000ZTC; Wed, 15 Nov 95 05:56 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 34529B04 ; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 4:56:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 22:55:08 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: correction to cowan on rafsi X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 613 Lines: 27 >#Specifically, for gismu of the form "C1V2C3C4V5" like "sakli", the possible >#CVC-form rafsi are 123 ("sak") and 124 ("sal"); the only possible CVV-form >#rafsi is 125, with or without an apostrophe between the vowels ("sa'i" or >#"sai"); and the possible CCV rafsi are 345 ("kli") and 125 ("sli"). > >You mean 145 for the last one. > >The term for lujvo made up solely of three-letter rafsi is "fully reduced >lujvo". Here are some examples of fully reduced lujvo: Neither is correct For a CVCCV, the possible rafsi are 123 124 125 345 and rarely 132 (kerfa -> kre) For a CCVCV 134 234 135 235 123 lojbab