Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tE0zp-0000ZTC; Fri, 10 Nov 95 23:28 EET
Message-Id: <m0tE0zp-0000ZTC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 507318FA ; Fri, 10 Nov 1995 22:28:25 +0100
Date:         Thu, 9 Nov 1995 18:57:23 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 384
Lines: 13

1. I guess {re lo mu broda} becomes {re boi mu broda}.

2. How does {re broda} vs {re lo broda} help to disambiguate

   A.  re le mu nanmu cu batci ci le mu gerku

? It doesn't help, I think, unless {ci lo le mu gerku} is
okay. If it indeed doesn't help, then either a more general
solution is needed, or, at least, we still need a ruling on
whether A. is 3 dogs or 6 dogs.

---
And