Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tHu9A-0000ZUC; Tue, 21 Nov 95 16:58 EET
Message-Id: <m0tHu9A-0000ZUC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 9D11DC3B ; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 15:58:07 +0100
Date:         Tue, 21 Nov 1995 07:02:55 -0500
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      buffering
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 290
Lines: 9

Cowan:
>Vowel buffering, OTOH, is supposed to be for the speaker's benefit,
>which is naljbo at best.

I don't see this.  The phonology is largely designed to make it easy for
speakers not to make errors.  It is morphology and grammar and semantics
that are more listener oriented.

lojbab