Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA12915 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 15:33:43 -0500
Message-Id: <199511292033.PAA12915@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 01262A0A ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 15:08:29 -0500
Date:         Wed, 29 Nov 1995 20:00:01 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 38: lambda via new selma'o CEhU
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Nov 29 15:33:47 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU

I'm mildly opposed, for the same reasons as Jorge. That is, we think {kea}
can do the job. Also, it is still not clear that CEhU won't still generate
more garbage than a lambda variable in KOhA. Will {ceu} make sense
everywhere a quantifier_300 can occur?
---
And