Message-Id: <199511230244.VAA28239@locke.ccil.org>
Date:         Wed, 22 Nov 1995 20:14:42 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      McCawley
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR

> I do not want to limit the discussion to those who do their homework,
> but I am not going to pay a lot of attention -- at least until things
> get desperate -- to someone who shows signs of not knowing what logic
> has done or not done in a given area. As a sort of minimal entrance
> requirement, I would recommend the relevant sections -- when there ae
> some (and there usually are) -- of McCawley's "Everything that
> Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic" (U/Chicago Press
> -- I have the old, '81, edition to hand, but there is one from a
> couple of years ago that updates matters slightly).

It is obscenely expensive, so I've not bought it, but I think pc is
right that a committed lojbanist ought to be a thoroughbred McCawley
toter. So I'll go off and order my copy [paperback price = c. 33
big macs, in UK].

---
And