Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA24842 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 15:21:49 -0500
Message-Id: <199511162021.PAA24842@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 29BC3F3E ; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 16:15:09 -0400
Date:         Thu, 16 Nov 1995 19:57:11 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: stress and le du'u
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Nov 16 15:21:55 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU

> >> With the exception of "bau", I can't think of any common cmavo
> >> which I have heard often in lujvo, and "bau" is one for which
> >> there is no meaning ambiguity.
> >Also {cai} and {rai}, which are like {bau}.
> I said *common* cmavo - those I have yet to notice in speech or text.
> bau gets USED.

That's what I meant. I was supporting your point. {Cai} I've used as
 both rafsi and cmavo, and I'm hardly Mr Prolific when it comes to
Lojban use.

---
And