Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tKiPO-0000ZUC; Wed, 29 Nov 95 11:02 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 424E96D6 ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 10:02:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 04:00:41 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: Fuzzy Fallacies X-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 664 Lines: 19 >It would be interesting to know what exactly is supposed to go in a >place for a standard. Are any of these right: > > ko'a condi fo mi > Koha is deep/tall by standard me. > > ko'a condi fo leka ke'a zmadu lo mitre be li papimu > Koha is deep/tall by standard being more than a length of 1.5m > > ko'a condi fo lo'e remna > Koha is deep/tall by standard the average human. > All. In the first you are comparing with yourself, in the second with 1.5M and in the 3rd with the average human. The open question is whether a anc require a tu'a, because elaborating requires the same kind of leka phrase as the 2nd. lojbab