Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id TAA12884 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 1995 19:19:07 -0500 Message-Id: <199511200019.TAA12884@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 9DB3314E ; Sun, 19 Nov 1995 20:11:03 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 19:05:55 -0500 Reply-To: Jorge Llambias Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Sun Nov 19 19:19:09 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU > > cu pamei sanli i ne'i le bitmu lo romoi voksa cu cusku sei krefu sei krefu > > ca ji'a le nu le solri ba'o galbi'o gi'e tergu'i le rokspi derxi e le bumru > > kei lu cabdei detri fa li mupi'ebipi'erenorexa i cabdei detri fa > > li mupi'ebipi'erenorexa i cabdei detri li'o li'u > > How do these {sei} work? I've started using {sei} as an adverbifier. I don't really understand what it's supposed to be used for, but it is often very convenient to have selbri modifiers other than stuck directly to the selbri. I suppose {fi'o se krefu ku} would do as well, but it is longer and has a terminator. > And doesn;t there need to be a {seu}? The second {sei krefu} gets attached to the first {krefu} according to the parser, but that seems ok: repeatedly repeating. The following {ca ji'a} does not get sucked into the sei. > How can you tell whether the {lio} is quoted or not? Good question... What if the voice actually did say the word {li'o}? I don't know. Maybe I should have said {li'osa'a}. > (Same question > for {si, sa, su} - how do you quote these?) Same answer. Perhaps {sisa'a} to actually delete a word within a quote, and {si} if that is what the person said. (What if the person actually said {sisa'a}?) Jorge