Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tF1n9-0000ZTC; Mon, 13 Nov 95 18:31 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 5559F275 ; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 17:31:30 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 10:01:37 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: rafsi for "jai" should be "jax-" X-To: Lojban List To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199511130645.BAA13628@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Nov 13, 95 06:38:44 am Content-Length: 587 Lines: 19 > (Why tolglico?) Since "x" is nalglico, rafsi with "CVx" are tolglico. > How does it work? Does {jai bai broda} turn into > {jaxybaibroda}? I suppose, although Nick/lojbab mostly seemed to want it for "jai broda", qua substitute for "broda gasnu". > On the subject of {jai}, could anyone tell me if JAI FA is > possible (rather than JAI BAI) As of now, no. If you seriously want it, propose it now, with supporting examples that can't easily be expressed in other ways. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.