Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tJKsL-0000ZVC; Sat, 25 Nov 95 15:42 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id BBF6BE50 ; Sat, 25 Nov 1995 14:42:40 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 1995 08:41:22 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: gradu X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1059 Lines: 26 >What predicate would you like in order to say that? Something like: > > x1 is x2 units (default=1) on scale/property x3 > >Unfortunately, I can't find a gismu with that structure. He doesn't need the default, and therefore klani has what he needs. >I remember that someone once proposed that {gradu} should have that >structure, but it seems that it wasn't changed. That the place >structure of all the specific units, it is really weird that the generic >unit doesn't have that structure. gradu isn't really a generic unit, though it has probably been used as such. It was originally meant to be the category containing the units, just as skari contains all the colors. Now with dikyjvo, I think both skari and gradu have trouble being used in lujvo as they were intended (cindu skari would be the color of an oak, but should have the generic colr place struture, and not a derivative of skari's place structure), and maybe Nick needs to include a note about these kinds of words. rango, danlu a nd a few others have this problem too. lojbab