From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:58:10 2010
Subject: Re: rel clause paper
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 09:39:45 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199511080121.UAA26143@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Nov 7, 95 08:01:04 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length:        565
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Nov  8 09:39:45 1995
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <ng6xfGe3kYM.A.-yB.C60kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

di'e se cusku la .and.

> Is it legitimate for one to ask for a means of doing what I
> asked about? {la djon tumclax} is not a solution, since, as you
> say, it may be not understood, as with "John Cowan", or it may
> be wrongly understood, as with "Noburo Takeshita" (I forget what
> exactly the first name was).

Well, with my proposed reading of "me" (or even without it, really)
you can say:

	la me la djan. tumclaxu

which means "The one named 'The one named "John" type-of land-lacker".
Suit?

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.