Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tGAYT-0000ZTC; Thu, 16 Nov 95 22:05 EET
Message-Id: <m0tGAYT-0000ZTC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A9EE2E84 ; Thu, 16 Nov 1995 21:05:04 +0100
Date:         Thu, 16 Nov 1995 19:57:11 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: stress and le du'u
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 465
Lines: 13

> >> With the exception of "bau", I can't think of any common cmavo
> >> which I have heard often in lujvo, and "bau" is one for which
> >> there is no meaning ambiguity.
> >Also {cai} and {rai}, which are like {bau}.
> I said *common* cmavo - those I have yet to notice in speech or text.
> bau gets USED.

That's what I meant. I was supporting your point. {Cai} I've used as
 both rafsi and cmavo, and I'm hardly Mr Prolific when it comes to
Lojban use.

---
And