Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tKkBW-0000ZUC; Wed, 29 Nov 95 12:56 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 27027A48 ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:56:16 +0100 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:53:54 MET Reply-To: Goran Topic Sender: Lojban list From: Goran Topic Subject: Re: fuzzy truth X-To: Lojban Listserv To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 968 Lines: 49 Translation follows. > > Diffidently I point out that this is another possible application for > > the Dreaded Subscript: .i ju'oru'e mi nelci > On the other hand, you could mention {je'u xipimu} for the fuzzies. > Bob Chassell also suggested {ju'o xipimu} for degrees of certainty, and > there would also be {la'a xipimu} for probabilities. .i zo xi jorne lo cmavo be zo .ui ji le lidne be ri valsi .i mu'a lu da ju'o xipa broda lu'u selsmu simsa la'elu daxipa ju'o broda li'u xunai co'o mi'e. goran. I think I like it. Does xi join with UI, or with the preceeding word? I.e. doesn't {da ju'o xipa broda} mean approximately the same as {daxipa ju'o broda}? -- GAT/CS/O d?@ H s:-@ !g p1(2)@ !au(0?) a- w+(+++) (!)v-@(+) C++(++++) UU/H(+) P++>++++ L(>+) !3 E>++ N+ K(+) W--(---) M-- !V(--) -po+ Y(+) t+@(+++) !5 !j R+@ G-@(J++) tv+(++) b++@ D++ B? e+* u@ h!$ f?(+) r-- !n(+@) y+. GeekCode v2.1, modifications left to reader to puzzle out