From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:57:56 2010
Subject: Re: Phonology Paper Released
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 09:51:49 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199511031723.MAA15777@locke.ccil.org> from "Paulo Barreto" at Nov 3, 95 08:24:00 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length:        544
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Nov  6 09:51:49 1995
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <GPAVbclwOeO.A.9uB.050kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la paulos. cusku di'e

> The IPA uses [X] (similar to lowercase Greek 'chi') to represent an
> unvoiced *uvular* fricative (check ipakeys.hlp in silip12a.exe).
> However, this symbol is consistently used throughout the paper. Does
> it mean [x] ? Are [x] and [X] accepted variants of Lojban 'x' ?
> Is [X] (uvular) the preferred version ?

Woops.  [x] is correct, though I suppose [X] might work as well, provided
it isn't mistaken for [R].  I have changed [x] to [X] throughout.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.