From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:58:00 2010
Subject: Re: fuzzy truth
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 16:28:05 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199511232039.PAA22115@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Nov 23, 95 08:25:54 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length:        989
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Nov 27 16:28:05 1995
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <4Z-cY4UDbmK.A.RwB.450kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la .and. cusku di'e

> Steve argues eloquently for the need to express fuzzy truth
> using numbers and for the psychological naturalishness of
> doing so. I am persuaded by these arguments, and conclude
> that we therefore need a new one-member selmao that takes
> a number expression (like MOI and ROI do) and yields a NA.
> I will call this cmavo {xoi} in selmao XOI.
> 
> But this isn't the job for a brivla, for if you are content with
> a brivla then we already have what you need: {jei}.
> 
>    li pi mu jei mi clani
>    "O.5 is the truth value of that I am tall"

I applaud this.

> In contrast, I want us to be able to say:
> 
>    mi pi mu xoi clani
>    pi mu xoi ku mi clani

Diffidently I point out that this is another possible application for
the Dreaded Subscript:

	mi ja'a xipimu clani
	ja'a xipimuku mi clani

Unless I hear sound objections (as opposed to loud howls) I'll write this
into the text paper.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.