From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:57:42 2010
Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 38: lambda via new selma'o CEhU
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 09:46:05 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199511300250.VAA28977@locke.ccil.org> from "Jorge Llambias" at Nov 29, 95 09:40:17 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length:        327
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Nov 30 09:46:05 1995
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <49AeClXo0i.A.7pB.m50kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la xorxes. cusku di'e

> I don't think it's overloading. In any case, what's the rush?
> If we find in practice that {ke'a} is causing confusion, a new one
> can be added, but I don't see that happening.

Trying to get the reference grammar out, that's the rush.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.