Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tGUs8-0000ZTC; Fri, 17 Nov 95 19:46 EET
Message-Id: <m0tGUs8-0000ZTC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 80CE12F2 ; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 18:46:43 +0100
Date:         Thu, 16 Nov 1995 23:06:04 -0500
Reply-To:     Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 434
Lines: 14

la lojbab cusku di'e

> There could also be some funky elidable effects:
>
> la noi ciska sutramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n.  would not work without
> a be'o or ku'o, but with a brivla istead of lojbab. would be fine.

A computer would take the {su} to delete everything that came before
and then be left with {tramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n.}.

I suppose you meant {sutrymau}. What a big difference a little typo
can make!

Jorge