Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tE104-0000ZTC; Fri, 10 Nov 95 23:28 EET
Message-Id: <m0tE104-0000ZTC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 5948BD07 ; Fri, 10 Nov 1995 22:28:40 +0100
Date:         Fri, 10 Nov 1995 21:09:22 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: rel clause paper
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 639
Lines: 16

fe die xe cusku fa la djan
> > Is it legitimate for one to ask for a means of doing what I
> > asked about?
> Well, with my proposed reading of "me" (or even without it, really)
> you can say:
>        la me la djan. tumclaxu
> which means "The one named 'The one named "John" type-of
> land-lacker". Suit?

Not satisfactory. I think of "Alfred the Great", "Dai Jones the
Bread", etc. A relative clause/phrase is part of the name. If
I use the name, I'm not claiming that Alfred was great, or that
Dai Jones is associated with the bread. Perhpas {la tumclaxu pou
la djan}, {la banli pou la alfred}? {la pou la alfred (geu) banli}?
---
And