Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tJpiC-0000ZUC; Mon, 27 Nov 95 00:38 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id B8B1FBD5 ; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 23:38:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 17:37:29 -0500 Reply-To: Jorge Llambias Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: kelci X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 562 Lines: 19 la kir cusku di'e > Must x2 of {kelci} be physical object? Is following legal? > > {mi kelci lenu mi nolraitru la fasygu'e kei} > > {mi kelci la lojban} As far as legality goes, the parser will accept them, so in that sense at least they are legal. As for their meaning, I don't know. Can Lojban be something with which one plays? It seems that it can. Can an event be something with which one plays? (Let's write it as {mi kelci lenu da'i mi nolraitru le fasygu'e} to placate And.) I'm not sure, but it certainly doesn't seem like complete nonsense. Jorge