Return-Path: Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tFoax-0000ZTC; Wed, 15 Nov 95 22:38 EET Message-Id: Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 1F97C6F2 ; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 21:38:10 +0100 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 20:34:32 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: lujvo query X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 810 Lines: 27 Iain: > > 1. Does {gerku zei zdani} conform to jvajvo principles? Would not > > {gerku zei se zei zdani}, {gerselzda}, "x1 is kennelled by x2", > > be more fitting? > .ianai > A {broda zei zdani} is some kind of {zdani}. A {gerku [zei] se > [zei] zdani} would be a dog-kind-of behomed-thing. Yes, so a kennel would be a {se gerselzda} or {selgerselzda}. Is there a jvajvo principle that says that in {broda zei cmoda}, b1 = c1? > Naked {jai} was introduced a long time ago as a sort of inverse > of {tu'a}. > x1 jai broda x2 x3 ... > tu'a x1 broda x2 x3 ... > but there's also an extra {fai} place for the original event > in broda's x1. > x1 jai broda x2 x3 ... fai xf > xf po'u lenu x1 co'e cu broda x2 x3 ... > ki'ape'i Kia indeed. I do not feel enlightened. --- And