Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id QAA28576 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Fri, 10 Nov 1995 16:32:51 -0500
Message-Id: <199511102132.QAA28576@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 755F3FD4 ; Fri, 10 Nov 1995 17:28:48 -0400
Date:         Thu, 9 Nov 1995 18:57:23 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Nov 10 16:32:52 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU

1. I guess {re lo mu broda} becomes {re boi mu broda}.

2. How does {re broda} vs {re lo broda} help to disambiguate

   A.  re le mu nanmu cu batci ci le mu gerku

? It doesn't help, I think, unless {ci lo le mu gerku} is
okay. If it indeed doesn't help, then either a more general
solution is needed, or, at least, we still need a ruling on
whether A. is 3 dogs or 6 dogs.

---
And