Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id GAA24328 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 06:05:25 -0500 Message-Id: <199511291105.GAA24328@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id DED2F2E1 ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 5:56:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:53:54 MET Reply-To: Goran Topic Sender: Lojban list From: Goran Topic Subject: Re: fuzzy truth X-To: Lojban Listserv To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Wed Nov 29 06:05:26 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Translation follows. > > Diffidently I point out that this is another possible application for > > the Dreaded Subscript: .i ju'oru'e mi nelci > On the other hand, you could mention {je'u xipimu} for the fuzzies. > Bob Chassell also suggested {ju'o xipimu} for degrees of certainty, and > there would also be {la'a xipimu} for probabilities. .i zo xi jorne lo cmavo be zo .ui ji le lidne be ri valsi .i mu'a lu da ju'o xipa broda lu'u selsmu simsa la'elu daxipa ju'o broda li'u xunai co'o mi'e. goran. I think I like it. Does xi join with UI, or with the preceeding word? I.e. doesn't {da ju'o xipa broda} mean approximately the same as {daxipa ju'o broda}? -- GAT/CS/O d?@ H s:-@ !g p1(2)@ !au(0?) a- w+(+++) (!)v-@(+) C++(++++) UU/H(+) P++>++++ L(>+) !3 E>++ N+ K(+) W--(---) M-- !V(--) -po+ Y(+) t+@(+++) !5 !j R+@ G-@(J++) tv+(++) b++@ D++ B? e+* u@ h!$ f?(+) r-- !n(+@) y+. GeekCode v2.1, modifications left to reader to puzzle out