Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id OAA03516 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 14:06:45 -0500 Message-Id: <199511241906.OAA03516@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A449E9EC ; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 14:57:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 13:56:24 -0500 Reply-To: Jorge Llambias Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: self-descriptions? X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Fri Nov 24 14:06:47 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU > >> ji'a I don't understand the second, either. Why sexipa? Isn't that the > >> same as {mi nundraci kelci}? > > > >I thought {se xi pa} gives the x6 place. x6 of {nundraci} is the actor. > > Not sure, but in nundraci doesn't the x1 of draci, the actor, get moved to > x2, x2 to x3, etc. and x5 to x6? Or does the x1 jump immediately to x6? That's right, the place structure of {nunbroda} is: n1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 The other question is whether {sexipa} gives you the x6 or the x1. > >This shows how limited our command of the language still is. > > Another possibility: it shows that Lojban is capable of more obfuscation > than some other languages. Perhaps a comparable sentence in Latin could > have been made that difficult even for a fluent Latinist (since Latin like > Lojban lets you thoroughly scramble word order) Lojban is even worse than Latin in that respect. In Latin, (I don't really know any Latin, bit I suppose that) the cases at least give you some idea of what to expect, you can start forming some relation among the arguments from the start. With fi-fa-fus you can't do anything until you know the selbri, and And had it as the very last word. Jorge