Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id UAA26175 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 20:21:58 -0500 Message-Id: <199511080121.UAA26175@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 6920C4E4 ; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 20:30:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 20:02:53 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: phonology X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Tue Nov 7 20:22:03 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU lojbab > So this may or may not help. If the [B] you are referring to is a > strident or continuent, it should be mapped as /v/; if it is a stop > and/or non-strident it should be mapped as /b/. If it overlaps these > two categories or some of the others mentioned above, then it is not a > single Lojban phoneme at all, and will probably be mapped differently by > different speakers. From context it is clear that the [B] under discussion is a voiced bilabial fricative, IPA beta. (Small cap B is voiced bilabial trill.) I wouldn't be happy to classify phones in terms of stridency. Phonologically, if there were a /B/ v. /v/ contrast, /B/ wd be nonstrident and /v/ strident. /B/ wd also be continuant. In English, [B] gets heard as /b/ or /v/, depending on context - la[B]our = labour, but fa[B]our = favour. Lojban will be the same, unless there is an explicit rule making [B] an allophone of /v/ or /b/ - I understand that it is an official allophone of /v/. --- And