Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id BAA13628 for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 01:45:56 -0500
Message-Id: <199511130645.BAA13628@locke.ccil.org>
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id E97EC070 ; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 2:40:52 -0400
Date:         Mon, 13 Nov 1995 06:38:44 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: rafsi for "jai" should be "jax-"
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Nov 13 01:45:57 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU

> A rafsi for "jai" was suggested by lojbab, acting on some remarks
> by Nick, over a year ago.  I was out to lunch at the time: I think
> having one is justified, and that it should be "jax" (rather than
> "jaz", the only remining other possibility), just to be tolglico.

(Why tolglico?) How does it work? Does {jai bai broda} turn into
{jaxybaibroda}?

On the subject of {jai}, could anyone tell me if JAI FA is
possible (rather than JAI BAI)? If so, then SE could be defined
as JAI FA, e.g. {se} = {jai fe}. I've no idea what {jai fai}
would mean, though.

---
And