Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tIKLH-0000ZWC; Wed, 22 Nov 95 20:56 EET
Message-Id: <m0tIKLH-0000ZWC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 0F9049C5 ; Wed, 22 Nov 1995 19:56:22 +0100
Date:         Wed, 22 Nov 1995 12:34:23 -0600
Reply-To:     Steve Hazel <hazel@TURING.CS.STEDWARDS.EDU>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Steve Hazel <hazel@TURING.CS.STEDWARDS.EDU>
Subject:      universal quantifiers
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 309
Lines: 9

Hmm...in nearly every natural language, universal quantifiers require referents.
I personally would like to see lojban not require referents, since such notation
would allow for easier expression of mathematical ideas.
*shrug*

.ui mi blanu badna zu'i
fynyorda

=Steven Hazel - hazel@turing.cs.stedwards.edu=