Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id NAA21610 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 13:45:36 -0500 Message-Id: <199511141845.NAA21610@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 93DB0F3A ; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 14:33:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 18:25:17 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: TEXT: How I spent my holidays X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Tue Nov 14 13:45:44 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU > .i le nunli'u girzu pe mi cu cuxna nu'i la romas. e. la .alitalias. > no'u le gugdrnitalia. vinji girzu nu'u mu'i tu'a lenu mi vinjykla > kei ki'u lenu cu'uku traji leka tolkargu ra'a leimi se platu > selyli'u kei foro vinji girzu How is {nui...nuu} working here? What is the intent of {cuuku}? > .i la bankok. cu menli cpina mi leka dukse djacu vacri glare kei noi Does cpina have x3? > .o'onai mojri'a mi la sidnis. kei .e lenu mi na'e snada facki lo ^^^?^^? > daskyselbei vrejytci poi banzu leka kakne fa'u tolkargu poi mi se > mansa kei mi Couldn't understand this jufra. > no'i le kindraci poi se jarco fi mi'a cu se cmene la rob. rois. That's unlikely. More likely, koa se cmene zo rob rois, iepei? > .isemu'ibo mi na'e carmi se cinri le ca krefu {ca} - to me it means the film was on while you were writing, right? You saw it on the coach to Manchester, not on the plane to Rome? Then why {nohi}? > .i le ropno cu frica le sralo lenu lei kindraci .e lei tivnydraci cu > se fanva fu le bangu be lo'e viska fi lo se bacru .enai lo seke ciska > jarco {fo le bangu} is meant, I think. Not all countries are equally culpable; Germans and Italians are especially reprehensible in this respect. > .i zo'e tignygau la DJEsikas. lang. mu'i leka leri kamcinse cu makcymlu > gi'e ni'ibo carmi frica leka cinse pe le'e nunvasxycru "J.L. is made to perform in order that there be the property that her sexuality seems mature and necessarily very different from the property, having to do with your average breathy speech, that there be sexuality." ???????????????? > ni'o co'u klama la romas ca li pano pi'e vomu Ontologically dubious. {ca le pa no pie vo mu moi} is truer. > .i le vijykla so'irprecarce cu kunti loi sarji gi'e slabu gi'e se bebna Can a carce be se bebna? Weird. --- And