Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tNR4m-0000ZUC; Wed, 6 Dec 95 23:08 EET
Message-Id: <m0tNR4m-0000ZUC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id D4DD3D31 ; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 22:08:26 +0100
Date:         Wed, 6 Dec 1995 21:02:54 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE X1: BAI afterthought connectives
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 230
Lines: 9

Jorge:
> Any connection of NUs is pretty nonsensical anyway,

{ga nu xi pa gi nu xi re} or {ga se nu gi te nu} are sensical,
and if {se je te broda} is dubious, it's about the only way to
conjoin sumti of the same bridi.

---
And