From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Thu Dec 21 11:34:30 1995
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Date: Thu Dec 21 11:34:30 1995
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      sera'aku le'ala'ezo PLI mezoigy. not yet gy.
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
Message-ID: <w1NfPBMkqJC.A.sbF.bu0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> i ki'u ma lu na co'a li'u naku smuni zoi gy no longer gy ?

How about "mi ba'o na'e klama"?  "I since am other-than going".

What is the scope of "na" and should we not be using "na'e" for negating the
bridi?