Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tMudp-0000ZUC; Tue, 5 Dec 95 12:30 EET
Message-Id: <m0tMudp-0000ZUC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 879451DC ; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 11:30:23 +0100
Date:         Tue, 5 Dec 1995 09:26:00 GMT
Reply-To:     Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: roses and tulips - oops!
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 456
Lines: 13

>    .i le vi rozgu cu zmadu le va tujli le jei melbi kei
>    li pi vo pe le li'i dirba fe mi

This is fine, but I would explicitly associate the scale with "zmadu" using

    .i le vi rozgu cu zmadu le va tujli le jei melbi kei li pivo
        ci'u le li'i dirba mi

which says that the more-ness of the beauty is on the scale of experience of
emotional value to me.  The restrictive clause is joined to the number, not
the whole relation.

co'omi'e dn.