Return-Path: <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@BITMAIL.LSOFT.COM>
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tLVLO-0000ZUC; Fri, 1 Dec 95 15:17 EET
Message-Id: <m0tLVLO-0000ZUC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 3AF0ECDC ; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 14:17:37 +0100
Date:         Fri, 1 Dec 1995 04:37:49 -0500
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE X4: Forethought bridi and
              bridi-tail connection
X-To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 193
Lines: 5

This one I am SURE won't YACC.  We tried - many times.  It requires
eliminating the grammatical distinction between bridi and bridi-tail
absolutely, not just in forethought connection.

lojbab