Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA04045 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 00:20:15 +0200 Message-Id: <199512072220.AAA04045@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 07750CF5 ; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:20:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 17:19:02 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited X-To: Lojban List To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199512011328.IAA20171@locke.ccil.org> from "Chris Bogart" at Nov 30, 95 03:13:25 pm Content-Length: 749 Lines: 24 mi cusku di'e > >However, the gismu "fasnu" is true only of such event abstract objects > >as actually occur. la stivn. cusku di'e > How does that fit in with the notion that unmarked bridi may be either > "ca'a" or "ka'e" or "nu'o"? Granted. ca'a fasnu x1 actually happens ka'e fasnu x1 could possibly happen nu'o fasnu x1 could happen but has not pu'i fasnu x1 can and has happened with appropriate changes for tense. But in any event, something can be "nu ... kei" without "ca'a fasnu", and probably even without "ka'e fasnu", being true of it. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.