Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA06769 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 14:43:51 +0200
Message-Id: <199512081243.OAA06769@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id ABF58C02 ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 13:43:51 +0100
Date:         Fri, 8 Dec 1995 07:37:39 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE X5: Restriction of JOI
X-To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 451
Lines: 13

>Do you have examples
>with ce, ce'o, jo'e, ku'a, or pi'u?

I can't even remember what some of them are.

I think we have done "nanmu ku'a ninmu" as heterosexual couples, and this
could also be used as a modifier (nanmu ku'a ninmu ke dansu nunsalci) a
dance/ball specifically for mixed couples.

If we didn;t have a word for "parents" mamta jo'e patfu should work and
is a little stronger than joi.  But I haven't thought this thru carefully.

lojbab