Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA00860 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 13:20:34 +0200
Message-Id: <199512211120.NAA00860@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 30D9BABD ; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 12:20:34 +0100
Date:         Thu, 21 Dec 1995 11:22:45 GMT
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      sera'aku mezoigy. {gliban} vs {inglic} gy.
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 390
Lines: 7

> Ah, but the very existence of the gismu {glico} (without which the cmene
> {gliban} wouldn't exist either) certainly has to do with the dominant-ish
> status that English has (along with the rest of the source languages and
> some others).  So Lojban dominates indirectly, in a manner of speaking.

.iku'i la'ogy. English gy. lo glibau cmene loi ba'e glita'a .i ra bacru lu
.inglic. li'u