Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA15928 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 09:10:47 +0200
Message-Id: <199512110710.JAA15928@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id A3D673B8 ; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 8:10:47 +0100
Date:         Mon, 11 Dec 1995 07:08:53 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: <mahi>
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 473
Lines: 15

cusku fa la stivn die:
> But if you can't remember where and if a gismu has a standard place, how
> does this bring the notion of a standard closer to the attention of
> speaker & listener? Its like trying to remember if <le stylo> and <la
> chat> in French are masculine or feminine.
> I would prefer that lojban be neutral as to which gismu need a `by
> standard' place and which require a <mahi>.

gohi rao

> cohomihe la stivn

ui! do na pilno meo yhy bu

coo, mie And