Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id HAA05007 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 07:41:56 +0200 Message-Id: <199512080541.HAA05007@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id BA59C498 ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 6:41:55 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:39:55 -0600 Reply-To: Steve Hazel Sender: Lojban list From: Steve Hazel Subject: a FAQ-related question X-To: lojban@cuvmb.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 369 Lines: 11 I'm curious about the nature of the argument that caused the split into TLI and LLG ... what is TLI doing now (if anything) and how might one go about contacting them? If anyone feels like delivering a passionate discourse on why LLG should be prefered to TLI, please feel free =^) co'o mi'e stiv Steven Hazel hazel@turing.cs.stedwards.edu e'osai ko sarji la lojban