From LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Sat Mar  6 22:46:15 2010
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Date: Thu Dec 21 06:38:13 1995
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      sera'aku mezoigy. {gliban} vs {inglic} gy.
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Dec 21 06:38:13 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU
Message-ID: <v5ywrecEbaE.A.cAG.3u0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> Ah, but the very existence of the gismu {glico} (without which the cmene
> {gliban} wouldn't exist either) certainly has to do with the dominant-ish
> status that English has (along with the rest of the source languages and
> some others).  So Lojban dominates indirectly, in a manner of speaking.

.iku'i la'ogy. English gy. lo glibau cmene loi ba'e glita'a .i ra bacru lu
.inglic. li'u