From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Mon Dec 11 02:24:07 1995
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Date: Mon Dec 11 02:24:07 1995
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: <mahi>
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
Message-ID: <nhmJXdBOHHC.A.aHG.9u0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

cusku fa la stivn die:
> But if you can't remember where and if a gismu has a standard place, how
> does this bring the notion of a standard closer to the attention of
> speaker & listener? Its like trying to remember if <le stylo> and <la
> chat> in French are masculine or feminine.
> I would prefer that lojban be neutral as to which gismu need a `by
> standard' place and which require a <mahi>.

gohi rao

> cohomihe la stivn

ui! do na pilno meo yhy bu

coo, mie And