Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA03507 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 20:27:46 +0200 Message-Id: <199512071827.UAA03507@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 8D265DA6 ; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 19:27:46 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 13:27:00 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE X4: Forethought bridi and bridi-tail connection To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Content-Length: 726 Lines: 17 >What is the semantic difference between {ta blanu} and {blanu fa ta}? >I don't see any special semantic content in the "observative" form. That is your problem. It's been explained to you often enough. >I don't see any special semantic content in the "observative" form. >At most it is a matter of emphasis, but that also exists in sentences >with foreterms, like {ko'a ko'e broda} vs {ko'a broda ko'e}. There is no rule that makes either of those two forms have different emphasis. Indeed in Russian, x2 is generally before the verb if it is a pronoun and after if it is anything else. NO emphasis implied. I have started to model that in my Lojban because of the intensity with which I have studied Russian. lojbab