Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA18848 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 03:03:25 +0200 Message-Id: <199512120103.DAA18848@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 7C090561 ; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 2:03:25 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:28:17 -0800 Reply-To: Dylan Thurston Sender: Lojban list From: Dylan Thurston Subject: Re: RET: jeks in descriptions X-To: Cyril Slobin X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: Content-Length: 758 Lines: 26 coi doi kir. > What > > mi nelci lo cukta be fi la lem. .e la borxes. > > means? Does it mean that I like books by Lem and books by Borjes > or that I like books written by Lem and Borjes together? The former. .e is a logical connective, which effectively means that it distributes in cases like this; the sentence is equivalent to mi nelci lo cukta be fi la lem. .ije mi nelci lo cukta be fi la borxes. To talk about books written be Lem and Borges together, use the non-logical connective {joi}: mi nelci lo cukta be fi la lem. joi la borxes. (Actually, this says "I like at least one book by Lem and Borges." Use {lo'e} to get the other sense: mi nelci lo'e cukta be fi la lem. .e la borxes.) co'o mi'e dilyn.