From LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Sat Mar 6 22:45:37 2010 Reply-To: Jorge Llambias Sender: Lojban list Date: Wed Dec 6 20:21:44 1995 From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: a triviality To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Wed Dec 6 20:21:44 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Message-ID: la stiv cusku di'e > could someone please tell me the difference between {le} and {lo}? > they seem to be used somewhat interchangably (though i've never seen > {lo} with the {ku} counterpart) an it's never defined in the lessons > *shrug* {ku} is the terminator for any member of selma'o LE, i.e. for any of {le}, {lo}, {lei}, {loi}, {lo'e}, etc. It is usually elidable. The difference between {le} and {lo}, as I understand it, is this: le broda = each of the broda that I'm talking about. lo broda = at least one of all the broda that there are. Using {le broda} means that you assume that your audience knows or can figure out which one(s) you mean. Using {lo broda} means that you are not giving any indication as to which of all broda satisfies the relationship in question, you are only saying that there is at least one of them that does. (Others view it somewhat differently, giving more importance to veridicality.) Jorge