Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA04122 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 00:42:29 +0200 Message-Id: <199512072242.AAA04122@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi> Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 228D609D ; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:42:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 16:30:51 -0500 Reply-To: Jorge Llambias Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: Observatives (simple) X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu, jorge@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 2245 Lines: 60 Bob Chassell: > {ta blanu} and {blanu fa ta} are both examples of bridi with a filled > first place. Both utterances mean "This at which I point is blue." I agree. > Incidentally, Jorge said regarding this query: > > I don't see any special semantic content in the "observative" form. > > I don't know what he meant here. Neither of those examples are > observatives. The question came up because we were trying to determine the difference in the semantics of bridi vs. bridi-tail. Lojbab brought up observatives to explain the difference, but if {blanu fa ta} is not considered an observative, then observatives are not relevant, because that definitely is a bridi-tail. Lojbab: > >I don't see any special semantic content in the "observative" form. > That is your problem. It's been explained to you often enough. I'm hard of understanding sometimes. :) But I don't really consider it a problem. I simply understand {broda ko'a} and {ko'a se broda} as meaning the same thing. I have no need for the concept of observative. Hopefully that won't make me misunderstand very much those who do use the concept. > >At most it is a matter of emphasis, but that also exists in sentences > >with foreterms, like {ko'a ko'e broda} vs {ko'a broda ko'e}. > > There is no rule that makes either of those two forms have different > emphasis. Right. So why should there be a rule that makes {ko'a broda} have different emphasis from {broda fa ko'a}, or {broda ko'a} from {ko'a se broda}. > Indeed in Russian, x2 is generally before the verb if it is > a pronoun and after if it is anything else. Just as in Spanish. > NO emphasis implied. I have > started to model that in my Lojban because of the intensity with which > I have studied Russian. That's good. I don't see any difference either, nor do I want there to be one. I would prefer that no difference be prescribed for "observatives" either. In any case, this still leaves us with the question of whether there exists a semantic difference between bridi and bridi-tail unanswered. According to Bob Chassell, an observative is a bridi with an elided x1. That makes {fe ko'a broda} an observative, so there would be no direct relationship between observatives and bridi-tail. Jorge