Return-Path: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@vms.dc.LSOFT.COM
Received: from SEGATE.SUNET.SE (segate.sunet.se [192.36.125.6]) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA04866 for <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 09:45:24 +0200
Message-Id: <199512220745.JAA04866@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from listmail.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id 4B738BFA ; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 8:45:22 +0100
Date:         Fri, 22 Dec 1995 02:44:49 -0500
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSAL: KUhAhU & KIhAhI
X-To:         ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 551
Lines: 12

>I realize that Lojban Central will be unswayed by the case for these
>new cmavo, but when I have to use {duu} I experience a mental nausea
>so acute that it is almost visceral too. So for my own health I must
>start using {suau}.

Your choice.  Just be aware that all of these are in experimental cmavo
space, are not official, and will not be recognized by any official
documents or the parser, etc.  I also personally will not be likely
to have any idea what these experimental cmavo mean when you use them,
and don't expect to learn them.

lojbab