From LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Sat Mar  6 22:46:12 2010
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Date: Fri Dec  8 08:20:38 1995
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: TECH: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE X5: Restriction of JOI
X-To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Dec  8 08:20:38 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU
Message-ID: <lcinSYIAmjC.A.Y-F.0u0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

>Do you have examples
>with ce, ce'o, jo'e, ku'a, or pi'u?

I can't even remember what some of them are.

I think we have done "nanmu ku'a ninmu" as heterosexual couples, and this
could also be used as a modifier (nanmu ku'a ninmu ke dansu nunsalci) a
dance/ball specifically for mixed couples.

If we didn;t have a word for "parents" mamta jo'e patfu should work and
is a little stronger than joi.  But I haven't thought this thru carefully.

lojbab