From cowan Wed Jan 17 10:24:32 1996
Subject: Re: TECH QUERY: variant fu'ivla
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:24:32 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <199601170041.TAA02036@locke.ccil.org> from "Paulo Barreto" at Jan 16, 96 10:10:16 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  661
Message-ID: <px4mEVtv-rH.A.xX.Z10kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>


la paulos. joi mi cusku be di'e casnu

> >A parallel situation exists in type 3 fu'ivla (those made with gismu-based
> >prefixes): either a four-letter rafsi or a CCV rafsi can be used as the
> >prefix (CVC and CVV rafsi aren't safe):
> 
> I think you mean either a four-letter rafsi or a CVC rafsi, and that CCV and
> CVV aren't safe: {pa dja,r,ki} -> {pad-jarki}

Correct: the fingers get a little confused, typing alladem C's and V's.

> > "ricrxacere" and "tricrxacere"
> .ui You used the latin ablative to form the fu'ivla!

Sic (or as they say in the West, hoc ille!)

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.