From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU Sat Jan 27 09:04:24 1996 Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (vms.dc.lsoft.com [205.186.43.2]) by locke.ccil.org (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id JAA03865 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 1996 09:04:08 -0500 Message-Id: <199601271404.JAA03865@locke.ccil.org> Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (205.186.43.4) by vms.dc.lsoft.com (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.0a) with SMTP id EC095E3B ; Sat, 27 Jan 1996 8:35:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 11:49:49 MET Reply-To: Goran Topic Sender: Lojban list From: Goran Topic Subject: Re: PLI: Cultural gismu To: Lojban Listserv Status: OR X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1221 > And that latter point is why I don't feel it is out of line to have skoto > cover both Irish and Scottish culture. If one decides to permit it to > cover Irish culture, one then makes lujvo to cover not only Irish, but also > the > other cultures that will contrast with Irish, so as to leave the gismu more > likely to be a general term. .i ie .i ku'i mi stidi lenu zoi gi'uste Gaelic/Scottish gi'uste goi ko'a noi ca xe fanva be zo skoto keiku binxo zoi gi'uste Celtic gi'uste .ija'ebo lo'i skoto cu selcmi lai alb. .e lai .eir. .e lai keltiber. .e lai gal. .e loi drata .imu'ibo loi sicko'o noi skotrneire na pe'i me ko'a Yes, but I think we should change the gismu definition from "Gaelic/Scottish" to "Celtic". That would permit {skoto} to include the Scottish and Irish and Celtiberic (?) and Gallic (Gaulic? sp?) and others. Because, Irish is IMHO definitely not Gaelic/Scottish! co'o mi'e. goran. -- GAT/CS/O d?@ H s:-@ !g p1(2)@ !au(0?) a- w+(+++) (!)v-@(+) C++(++++) UU/H(+) P++>++++ L(>+) !3 E>++ N+ K(+) W--(---) M-- !V(--) -po+ Y(+) t+@(+++) !5 !j R+@ G-@(J++) tv+(++) b++@ D++ B? e+* u@ h!$ f?(+) r-- !n(+@) y+. GeekCode v2.1, modifications left to reader to puzzle out